Conversations in blogs about cognitivism and learning theories in general are abundant. The two conversations linked below are examples of fascinating discussions in 2007 on cognitivism and behaviorism among three important thinkers: Bill Kerr, Stephen Downes, and Karl Kapp. While the discussions are several years old, the issues and questions they raise are still relevant today. Read these two blog posts, and then form a response to post in your own blog. Be sure to link to these posts in your blog and add tags for “learning theory” and “cognitivism,” along with any other topics you explore.
After reading the conversations on both blogs by Kerr, Downes and Kapp, all three theorists hold and argue valid points about learning theories. Even though these theories are dated, they still hold true are remain relevant in 21st century learning and as these theories, and possibly new theories expose how people learn, researchers and educators will gain a deeper understanding of the individuals learning process (Kerr, 2007).
Of all three points of view, I feel that Kerr makes the most valid statements about learning theories; he argues that the basis of superior educational instruction is formed around that basis that components from all learning theories are imperative to address the individual learner (Kerr, 2007). Kapp also shares a similar view, we must consider the fact that all learners are not equal, and therefore we must take necessary components from some or all the learning theories to best address the individuals learning style (Kapp, 2007).
In the conversation, Downes and Kerr (2007) made points about cognitivism in relation to the idea that learning occurs internally and through social interactions. However, there was a counter argument that I felt did not coincide with this argument; Downes stated how minds are similar to computers. I agreed with Kerr, to an extent, in which minds are not like computers. I feel the mind is similar to a computer; however I feel it is more complex in the way it can store and retrieve information and memories. However, with advances in technology, it could very well supersede how the mind works.
I feel that even though many still carp on the behaviorist ideals for not considering what occurs in the mind during learning, however I feel that the idea of actions and rewards are still relevant and important to learning. No matter the theory or theories we use we must ensure our selection meet the needs of all learners.
The following links provide great information about the learning theories and education, both traditonal teaching and educational technology.
References
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/